
In this issue, you'll find:
Finance Committee Questions Administration's Medicaid Proposals
During
a Senate Finance Hearing on February 16, 2005, Health and Human
Services (HHS) Secretary, Mike Leavitt, faced tough questions from
Senators on the details of the Administration's Medicaid reform
proposals.
The President's FY 2006 budget proposal, release
on Monday, February 7, 2005, recommends cuts of $60 billion in federal
Medicaid spending over the next ten years.
In response to the Senators concerns over the Medicaid reductions, Leavitt explained that there were three main areas of "inappropriate" spending that the budget cuts would target - overpayment for prescription drugs, asset transfers by individuals (mostly elderly) seeking to secure their eligibility under Medicaid, and "abuse" of intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) and other accounting measures employed by states to draw down more federal money. Secretary Leavitt went on to state that the cuts would essentially close loopholes and would not affect services.
Many observers disagree with Mr. Leavitt's assessment of the budget proposals, arguing several recommendations would shift costs to the states, if not generate cuts in services. For example, establishing a 50 percent federal matching rate for targeted case management services would force states with higher federal matching rates to cover a greater percentage of the costs for these services.
During
Wednesday's hearing, Secretary Leavitt repeatedly stressed the
Administration's interest in greater flexibility for states to provide
services to more individuals in a budget neutral manner. While several
Committee members questioned the feasibility of this type of proposal,
Secretary Leavitt explained that he was currently meeting with state
governors to craft a viable proposal.
Administration, Grassley Discuss Drug Safety Initiatives
On
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt announced
that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would be creating an
independent oversight board to handle drug safety.
President Bush's pick for FDA chief and current Acting Commissioner, Lester Crawford, stated that the board would be charged with securing new "communication channels" to improve the dissemination of information to the public. The board would consist of FDA and other HHS officials as well as members of other relevant government agencies.
Senate Finance Chairman, Charles Grassley (R-IA) stated this week that he would be introducing legislation in early March aimed at creating an independent drug safety office within the FDA. Despite the seeming overlap in jurisdiction of the two entities, Chairman Grassley has stated that it is "always better to have more watchdogs."
These
two announcements come during a week of testimony before an FDA risk
management advisory committee regarding the safety of painkillers known
as COX-2 inhibitors. Vioxx, a widely used COX-2 inhibitor, was pulled
from the market in September, 2004 after studies showed increased risk
of cardiovascular problems among consumers.
HELP Committee Examines Reimportation
The
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee met
Wednesday and Thursday to discuss the pros and cons of legislation that
would allow Americans to reimport prescription drugs from other
countries. Chairman Michael Enzi (R-WY) said that it would be possible
to develop a bill allowing for reimportation provided the bill
maintained current US standards of drug safety and effectiveness.
The
hearing focused on a report issued by the HHS Task Force last December,
which concluded that the cost of a reimportation plan would exceed
savings for consumers and could limit future medicinal developments.
The Undersecretary for International Trade Administration at the
Commerce Department, Grant Aldonas, testified on the negative impact of
reimportation, claiming it would affect the US’s ability to negotiate
trade agreements. He also agreed with the Task Force’s report, citing
that price controls would decrease funds that pharmaceutical companies
use for research and development of new medicines, thereby resulting in
fewer new drugs each year.
Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation Passed by Senate
On
Thursday, February 17, 2005 the Senate passed the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2005 (S. 306). The legislation would establish
guidelines for health insurers and employers around genetic information
and disclosure.
Currently, most states have their own
guidelines for the use of genetic information, however, they differ
significantly from state to state. With the passage of this federal
legislation, the Senate hopes to establish consistent and, therefore,
more effective rules.
Congress in Recess Until March 1, 2005
For further information on any topics discussed or publications listed, or to get copies of anything mentioned in this alert, please call (202) 466-6550 and ask for the Legislative Practice Group.
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville P.C. is a full service law firm
specializing in health care and education law and located at 1875 Eye St., NW
12th Floor, Washington DC 20006
© Copyright 2005, Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville P.C.
All rights reserved.